In an April 2nd decision, an Appellate court reminds foreclosing lenders to say what you mean and mean what you say. Claire Taylor and Tom Lerner explain that ambiguity and delay can lead to unintended outcomes.
Stokes Law Briefs
In Centrum Financial Services v. Union Bank, decided December 17, 2017, the Court of Appeals clarified the limitations on the right of a junior lienholder to cure a default of a senior secured indebtedness. Tom Lerner reminds lenders to use caution when considering whether to foreclose on a second deed of trust.
Tom Lerner provides a recap of key foreclosure cases from 2016.
Accelerating a defaulted loan seems almost automatic. There will be times when the statute of limitations may lead to a different decision. Tom Lerner explains that the Court of Appeals holds that the decision to accelerate must be explicitly stated. It is not enough to leave it to be inferred.
On July 25, 2016, in Bero v. Name Intelligence, Inc., the Washington Court of Appeals held that a receivership could be terminated without resolving all timely filed claims. Tom Lerner explains how creditors who want to be sure that their claims are adjudicated in a receivership will have to take a more active role in the litigation than has typically been required.
The Washington Court of Appeals summarized settled law governing the interplay between an installment promissory note secured by a deed of trust, a bankruptcy discharge, and the statute of limitations. Tom Lerner describes how the court also clarified that service of a foreclosure notice of default is enough to stop the statute of limitations from running.